INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH FOR REDUCING SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN URBAN AREA: A CASE STUDY OF MARGINAL GROUPS IN KAMPUNG SEMANGGI, SOLO, CENTRAL JAVA

Authors

  • Henny Warsilah Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan-LIPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v17i2.283

Abstract

Since the 1980’s the paradigm of development in developing countries, especially in urban areas, has relied on the economic development with economic growth as the main output. This model tends to produce poverty, deprivation, and social exclusion. Social exclusion is a condition, in which individuals, families, and groups in the population do not have the social and political access toward social resources, lack of participation in social activities, and have inadequate living conditions and facilities. This development paradigm has been criticized as it only uses economic indicators and neglects other non-economical aspects. The challenge is to redefine or conceptualize the development in a wider term as a continuum process on a society or a social system led to social inclusion. It is a new approach, which develops an open environment and involves everyone from various backgrounds in the development process. As the development gap between rural and urban areas is getting wider, understanding social inclusion development is a need. Furthermore, President Joko Widodo’s (Jokowi) Nawacita declared that the State must be present among society; therefore, the development should start from the periphery to the centre in order to improve the quality of life, prosperity, and democracy. This paper aims to reconstruct the values of urban development along with the concept of social inclusion in order to increase the quality of life, social relationships, social cohesion, social participation, and social capital in Solo, Central Java. Keywords: social exclusion, social inclusion, inclusive development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basset, K., Hoare, T., & Glen, N. (1996). The Emergence of Postmodernism on the Urban Waterfront. Great Britain: Pergamon. crossref

Belsky, E.S. (2012). Planning for inclusive and sustainable urban development. Dalam Starke, Linda (Ed.) State of the World 2012: Moving Toward Sustainable Prosperity (hlm. 38-52). Washington DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. crossref

Blakely, E.J. & Bradshaw, T.K. (2002). Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Bulan, W.R. (2013). Local Reform di Kota Solo pada era JOKOWI (TAHUN 2005-2012):

BPS. 1970. Analisis dan Penghitungan Tingkat Kemiskinan 1970. Jakarta.

Brata, A.G. (2004). Nilai Ekonomis Modal Sosial pada Sektor Informal Perkotaan. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Atma Jaya.

Busse, S. (2001). Strategis of Daily Life: Social Capital and the Informal Economy in Russia. University of Chicago, and The World Bank. 1998. hlm. 5-7.

Coleman, J. (1988). “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.â€American Journal of Sociology 94. (Supplement) S95S120. (Dalam: The World Bank. 1998. Hal 5-7). crossref

Derwanto, A. (2014) “INDEKS ... Ilustrasi Pembangunan .... 7 Sekolah Inklusi Dapat Prioritas Bantuanâ€. Harian Umum Solopos (28 Oktober).

Huntington, S.P. (1983). Tertib Politik di Dalam Masyarakat yang Sedang

Berubah. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Grootaert, C. (1997). “Social Capital: The Missing Link?†in Expanding the

Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally

Issue

Section

ARTICLES