KAMPONGS AND THE INFORMAL ECONOMY AS A SMART CITY NARRATIVE FROM THE GRASSROOTS

Authors

  • Rusydan Fathy P2KK
  • Gumilar Rusliwa Somantri
  • Henny Warsilah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55981/jmb.2022.1465

Keywords:

global city, space, informal economy, kampong

Abstract

Information and communication technology has impacted on the transformation and dynamics of cities in the
world, represents by Global city and smart city. Conceptually, it is important to generate narratives at the local
level into the global discourse. This research uses a sociological perspective to elaborate on the existence of the
kampongs and the informal economy as a space for production, contestation, and negotiation of local aspects in
the context of a global city and smart city. In this research, kampong is a case study. Theoretically, this research
enrich the study of urban sociology to understand space production at the local level as an alternative narrative in
the global city and smart city discourse. Specifically and practically, this research offers ideas about the importance
of revitalizing the kampongs economy through smart city implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart cities policies: A spatial approach. Cities. Elsevier Ltd, 41, pp. 3-11.

Budianti, M. (2018). Pendahuluan, dalam Budianti, M & Hapsarini, D (Eds) Meniti arus lokal-global: Jejaring budaya kampung. Depok: Infernia Publishing.

Bromley, R. & Wilson, T. D. (2018). The informal economy revisited. Latin American Perspektives, Issues 218, 45 (1), pp. 4-23.

Charmes, J. (2012). Informal economy wordlwide: Trends and characteristics. Jornal of Applied Economic Research, 6 (2), pp. 103-132.

Franklin, B. & Tait, M. (2002). Constructing an image: The urban village concept in the UK. Planning Theory, SAGE Publication, 1 (3), pp. 250-272.

IDEAS. (2017). Penggusuran dan reproduksi kemiskinan kota: Studi kasus di empat rusunawa Jakarta. Tangerang Selatan: Dompet Dhuafa Republika.

Labonté, R. Abdullahe, H. & Xaxier E. K. (2014). Indicators of social exclusion and inclusion: A critical and comparative analysis of the literature. Diunduh dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235443128_Indicators_of_Social_Exclusion_and_Inclusion_A_Critical_and_Comparative_Analysis_of_the_Literature.

McGee, T. G. (1989). Urbanisasi or kotadesasi? Evolving urban patterns of urbanization in Asia, dalam F. J. Costa, et. al. (Eds) Urbanization in Asia, pp. 93-108. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

McGee, T. G. (1991) The emergence of desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis, dalam N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel & T. G. McGee. (Eds) The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia, pp. 3-25. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Mora, L. et.al. (2019). Smart city development ICT innovation for urban sustainability. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89474-4_6.

Neirotti, P. et al. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, Elsevier Ltd, 38, pp. 25–36.

Rachmawan, D. Fathy, R. & Luthfi, M. 2019. Kerentanan dan strategi bertahan pedagang kaki lima (PKL): Studi kasus PKL di kawasan perkantoran segitiga emas Jakarta. Laporan penelitian dalam program Research Associate Jakarta Properti Institute.

Setiawan, B. (2010). Kampung kota dan kota kampung: tantangan perencanaan kota di Indonesia. Pidato pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar dalam Ilmu Perencanaan Kota UGM, tanggal 28 Oktober 2010 di Yogyakarta.

Widjadja, P. (2013). Kampung kota Bandung. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Wirutomo, P. (2013). Mencari makna pembangunan sosial: Studi kasus sektor informal di kota Solo. Masyarakat Jurnal Sosiologi, 18 (1) pp. 101-120.

Yigitcanlar, T. et al. (2018). Understanding smart cities: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities. Elsevier, pp. 145–160.

Published

2022-05-31