ILMU SOSIAL DI INDONESIA: PELUANG, PERSOALAN DAN TANTANGAN

Authors

  • Rochman Achwan Departemen Sosiologi, FISIP UI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v12i3.157

Abstract

Social science in Indonesia has enjoyed the luxury that has never been experienced in modern scientific history in the country. Nonetheless, this luxury has not been able to trail the development of social sciences achieved by neighboring countries. Using the concepts of social science’s types, this article concludes that the development of professional social science and critical social science has far left behind the development of public and policies related social science. This disparity actually marked the poor-quality of our social science development. This writing also recommends the needs to construct national social science by focusing on the revitalization of scientific association and reorientation of the method of social scientist’s thinking. By the time these steps are taken, Indonesian social scientists will be able to develop theories, concepts, and appropriate methodology within the contexts of Indonesian society. The national social science will become the amalgamation of Western social theories with local societal context. Keywords: social science development, Indonesia, revitalization of scientific association, reorientation of social science method

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, Ulrich., Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth., 1995. The Normal Chaos of

Love, London: Polity Press.

Burawoy, Michael., 2009. The Extended Case Method: Four Countries,

Four Decades, Four Great Transformations, and One Theoretical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Burawoy, M. 2004. ‘Public Sociologies: Contradictions, Dilemmas, and

Possibilities’. Social Forces (82) 4.

Evans, Peter., 2003. “Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls

of Monocropping and Potentials of Deliberationâ€, Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley

Ganie-Rochman, Meuthia., Achwan, R., 2005. ’Inclusion and Exclusion: NGOs and Critical Social Knowledge’, in Vedi R Hadiz and Daniel Dhakidae (eds). Social Science and Power in Indonesia, Singapore: Equinox and ISEAS.

Gerke, S. and Evers, H.D., 2006. ‘Globalizing Local Knowledge: Social

Science Research on Southeast Asia, 1970-2000’. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 21 (1).

Hadiz, V. R., Dhakidae, D., (eds), 2005. “Introductionâ€, in Vedi R

Hadiz and Daniel Dhakidae (eds), Social Science and Power in Indonesia, Singapore: Equinox and ISEAS: 1-30.

Mau-Keui Chang et al, 2010. “Indigenization, Institutionalization, and

Internationalization: Tracing the Paths of the Development of

Sociology in Taiwanâ€, in Burawoy, Michael at al, Facing An Unequal World: Challenges for A Global Sociology vol 2, Joint Publication of the Institute of Sociology, Taiwan and Council of National Associations of the International Sociological Association, 2010.

Lin, N., 2001. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action,

Cambridge University Press, New York.

Portes, Alejandro., 2006. “Institutions and Development: A Conceptual

Reanalysisâ€, Population and Development Review 32 (2).

Sato, Yoshimichi., 2010. “Are Asian Sociologies Possible? Universalism versus Particularismâ€, in Burawoy, Michael at al, Facing An Unequal World: Challenges for A Global Sociology vol 2, Joint Publication of the Institute of Sociology, Taiwan and Council of National Associations of the International Sociological Association.

Stuckler, David., King, L., McKee, M., 2009. “Mass privatisation and

the post-communist mortality crisis: a cross-national analysisâ€, the Lancet, Vol. 373, Issue 9661.

Uys, Tina. 2010. “Resitance to Rating: Resource Allocation, Academic

Freedom and Citizenshipâ€, in Burawoy, Michael at al, Facing An Unequal World: Challenges for A Global Sociology vol 1, Joint Publication of the Institute of Sociology, Taiwan and Council of National Associations of the International Sociological Association.

Issue

Section

ARTICLES