REVISITING THE TERMINOLOGY OF BID'AH HASANAH AS A COUNTER DISCOURSE AGAINST BID'AH DALALAH IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v23i2.1098Keywords:
Terminology, Counter Discourse, Bid’ah Hasanah, Public Sphere, Academic SphereAbstract
Abstract: This paper is aimed to revisit the existence terminology of Bid’ah Hasanah (Good Innovation) in the public and academic sphere as a counter discourse against the dominance of established meaning of Bid’ah which in terms of Islamic Sharia is interpreted as an act of misguidance (Bid’ah Dalalah). Counter discourse is a way of thinking that opposes an institutionalized discourse. In this context, we try to investigate the emergence of this term and describe how it is expressed as an opposing thought against the negative meaning of Bid'ah which was discursively long-established in the public and academic sphere by conducting the grounded approach. The data collected is taken from a mini survey and some specific discourses related to this topic such as the discussions in some chapters of the Islamic teaching textbook, and discourses from the online sources including social media and some websites affiliated with certain religious groups. The result shows that the terminology of Bid’ah Hasanah is emerged and echoed by traditional religious groups to label the non-exclusive worships (Ghairu Mahdhah) that originally don’t require any special rules in its implementation. According to them, this term is retrieved and interpreted from several Hadiths and the words of the Prophet’s companions. In the public and academic sphere, this term is still being roughly debated by some religious groups, mainly the Salafis and the traditionals, due to their differences in the methodology of meaning to this term. The Salafis prioritize the textual rigorous Sharia meaning contained in this term, whereas traditional parties put forward the literal and original meaning in understanding this term.
Downloads
References
Adam, Fadzli et al. (2015). Heretical Innovation of Distorted Beliefs (Bid’ah Dalalah) and Superstitious Practices Among Muslim Society in Malaysia, in Asian Social Science Vol. 11, No. 24: 2015 p. 147
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n24p147
Anam, F.K. et al (ed.). (2018). Pendidikan Agama Islam Transformatif: Membentuk Pribadi Berkarakter. 5th edition. Malang: Dream Litera
Anshari, Zaidan. (2018). Sejarah Diskursur Bid’ah: Studi atas Genealogi Kata Bid’ah dan Keterlibatan Konteks Sosial di Dalamnya. Master’s Thesis of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga
Assegaf, J.S. (2014). “Media Sosial Terlaris: Ini Keunggulan Twitter Dibanding Facebook dan Instagramâ€, Solopos.com 30th December 2014, retrieved from https://www.solopos.com/media-sosial-terlaris-ini-keunggulan-twitter-dibanding-facebook-dan-instagram-563081 (Accessed 14th July 2020)
Astuty, A.W. (2019). “Masih Ramai, Ini 5 Kelebihan Twitter Dibanding Media Sosial Lainâ€, IDN Times 25th January 2019, retrieved from https://www.idntimes.com/life/inspiration/annisa-widi-astuty/kelebihan-pakai-twitter-c1c2-1/5 (accessed on 14th July 2020)
al-Baihaqy, Abu Bakr Ahmad bin al-Husain. (1970). Manaqib asy-Syafi’i. Cairo: Dar at-Turats
Bamberg, M. and Andrews, M. (2004). Introduction to the Book, in Considering Counter-Narratives: Narrating, resisting, making sense. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.4.01bam
Burney, Shehla. (2012). Resistance and Counter-Discourse: Writing Back to the Empire. Counterpoints, 417, 105-116. www.jstor.org/stable/42981701
Bunzel, Cole. (2015). “From Paper to Caliphate: The Ideology of the Islamic Stateâ€, Report: Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings https://www.brookings.edu/research/from-paper-state-to-caliphate-the-ideology-of-the-islamic-state/
Charmaz, Kathy. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
van Dijk, Teun. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis, in Discourse and Society Vol. 4 (2) p. 249-283. London: Sage Publishing
Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (2006). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction
Hadley, Gregory. (2017). Grounded Theory in Applied Linguistics Research: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge
Hartono, B.A. et al. (1994). Kemauan dan Kemampuan Bertanya Sebagai Ciri Daya Kreativitas dalam Hubungan dengan Iklim Belajar Mengajar, Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Vol 1 No 2 August 1994 p. 99-107 retrived from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/114429-ID-kemauan-dan-kemampuan-bertanya-sebagai-c.pdf
Heracleous, Loizos. (2006). A Tale of Three Discourses: The Dominant, the Strategic, and the Marginalized, in Journal of Management Studies Vol. 43 Issue 5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00629.x
Ibn-Faris. (1979). Mu’jam Maqayis al-Lughah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr
Jahroni, Jajang. (2018). Ritual, Bid’ah, and the Negotiation of the Public Sphere in Contemporary Indonesia, in Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies Vol. 25 No. 1: 2018. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v25i1.5308
Katili, L.D. (ed.). (2015). Pendidikan Agama Islam di Perguruan Tinggi: Rujuan Utama Dosen dan Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. 3rd edition. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing
Lauzière, H. (2010). The Construction of Salafiyya: Reconsidering Salafism from The Perspective of Conceptual History. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(3), 369-389.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743810000401
Macgilchrist, Felicitas. (2007). Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourses by Reframing the Issues, in Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines Vol. 1 (1) p. 74-94 https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/volume-1-1/
Moreno, Juan Carlos Antunez. (2017). “Salafism: From a Religious Movement to a Political Forceâ€, Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2017), pp. 11-41.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18847/1.5.2
Muhtadin. (2016). Pendidikan Agama Islam pada Perguruan Tinggi. 2nd Edition. Jakarta: PT Mandala Nasional
Muhtadin & Ritonga, Rajab. (2018). Socialization of Bid’ah for the Worshipers at Al-Hikmah Mosque of The Ministry of Social Affairs, dalam International Conference on Community Development (ICCD) Vol.1 (1) 2018 p. 184-191.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33068/iccd.Vol1.Iss1.29
Mulawarman & Nurfitri, A.D. (2017). “Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial Berserta Implikasinya Ditinjauh dari Perspektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan,†Buletin Psikologi Vol. 25 No. 1, p. 36-44
DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22759
Musadad, A.N., & Ngarfillah, I. (2016). Polemik “Ahli Bid’ah†dalam Wacana Ulumul Hadis: Evaluasi Ibnu Hajar al-‘Asqalany terhadap Status Riwayat al-Mubtadi`, Universum: Jurnal Keislaman dan Kebudayaan Vol. 10 No. 1 Januari 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/universum.v10i1.219
Mustafaraj, E., S. Finn, C. Whitlock and P. T. Metaxas. (2011). "Vocal Minority Versus Silent Majority: Discovering the Opinions of the Long Tail," IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, Boston, MA, 2011, pp. 103-110
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.188
Mustofa, Saiful. (2019). Berebut Wacana: Hilangnya Etika Komunikasi di Ruang Publik Dunia Maya, Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat Vol. 15, No. 1 (2019)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v15i1.1139
an-Naisabury, Abu al-Hasan Muslim bin al-Hajjaj. (2006). Shachih al-Muslim. Riyadh: Dar Thayyibah
al-Shathibi. (1997). al-I’tisham. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi
Sopyan, Yayan. (2018). Tarikh Tasyri’: Sejarah Pembentukan Hukum Islam. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Sugara, Robi. (2017). Reinterpretasi Konsep Bid’ah dan Fleksibilitas Hukum Islam Menurut Hasyim Asyari. Asy-Syari’ah Vol. 19 No. 1, Juni 2017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v19i1.4029
Urquhart, Cathy. (2013). Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Zarif, Muhammad Mustaqim Mohd, et al (2013). Creating Creative and Innovative Muslim Society: Bid’ah as an Approach, in Asian Social Science Vol.9 No.11 2013.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 1970 Muhammad Lukman Arifianto Arifianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright for articles in this journal is retained by the authors.
- Authors grant to the journal first publication rights and the right to distribute the article, including the journal's web site, online data bases and other similar forms.
- Authors agree to license their work according to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in JMB are free to use for non-commercial uses as long as the authors and the journal are attributed properly and the new creations are licensed under the indentical terms (license Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
- Authors retain the right to reproduce and distribute their articles in any format, without prior authorization, with the proper acknowledgment to the first publication.
- If the article contains copyright material owned by others, authors should obtain written permission from the copyright owner/s in order to reuse the material. Appropriate acknowledgment should be included.
- Authors are encouraged to post their article online (in institutional repositories, personal websites etc). Any such posting must include a reference and a link to the journal's website.
Penulis yang menerbitkan pada jurnal ini menyetujui ketentuan berikut:
- Hak cipta untuk artikel dalam jurnal ini disimpan oleh penulis.
- Penulis memberikan kepada jurnal hak publikasi pertama dan hak untuk mendistribusikan artikel, termasuk situs web jurnal, basis data online dan bentuk serupa lainnya.
- Penulis setuju untuk melisensikan karya mereka sesuai dengan Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- Artikel yang diterbitkan dalam JMB bebas digunakan untuk penggunaan non-komersial selama penulis dan jurnal dikaitkan dengan benar dan kreasi baru dilisensikan menurut istilah indentis (lisensi Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
- Penulis mempertahankan hak untuk mereproduksi dan mendistribusikan artikel mereka dalam format apa pun, tanpa izin sebelumnya, dengan pengakuan yang tepat untuk publikasi pertama.
- Jika artikel tersebut berisi materi hak cipta yang dimiliki oleh orang lain, penulis harus mendapatkan izin tertulis dari pemilik hak cipta untuk menggunakan kembali materi tersebut. Pengakuan yang tepat harus disertakan.
- Penulis didorong untuk memposting artikel mereka secara online (dalam repositori institusional, situs web pribadi dll). Setiap posting seperti itu harus menyertakan referensi dan tautan ke situs web jurnal.