<-- "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> FORMASI DAN STRUKTUR GERAKAN SOSIAL PETANI [Studi Kasus Gerakan Reklaiming/ Penjarahan Atas Tanah PTNP XII (Persero) Kalibakar, Malang Selatan] | Wahyudi | Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya

FORMASI DAN STRUKTUR GERAKAN SOSIAL PETANI [Studi Kasus Gerakan Reklaiming/ Penjarahan Atas Tanah PTNP XII (Persero) Kalibakar, Malang Selatan]

Wahyudi Wahyudi

Abstract


This research was conducted in Ex-Dutch Plantation Kalibakar, in the south of Malangand had objective to analyze the formation and structure of peasant movement in Kalibakar. This research resulted understanding that peasant social movements are determined by: structural conduciveness, structural strain, growth and spread generalized belief, precipitating factors, participant activation and mobilization, social control, support of network movement, decision making arena, and social structure differentiation. Keywords: peasants movement, peasants social movement formation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Araf dan Puryadi, 2002, Perebutan Kuasa Tanah. Yogyakarta: LAPPERA Pustaka Utama.

Bachriadi, Dianto dan Lucas, Anton, 2001, Perlawanan Petani dalam Kasus Tapos dan Cimacan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Creswell, John W, 1994, Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thoasand Oaks California: SAGE Publications.

Eckstein, Susan (1989), Power and Populer Protest, Latin America Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hafid, 2001, Perlawanan Petani, Kasus Tanah Jenggawah. Jakarta: LSPP Latin.

Kartodirdjo, Sartono, 1984, Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888. Jakarta: PT. Dunia Pustaka Jaya.

Kuntowijoyo, 2002, Radikalisasi Petani. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Gentang Budaya.

Larana, Johnston, Gusfield, 1994, New Social Movements: from Ideology to Identity.Temple University Press.

Nagazumi, Akira, 1988, Pemberontakan Indonesia pada Masa Pendudukan Jepang. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Ritzer, George dan Goodman, Douglas J., 2003, Teori Sosiologi Modern (Terjemahan dari Alimandan). Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Shiraishi, Aiko Kurasawa, 1988, Pendudukan Jepang dan Perubahan Sosial: Penyerahan Padi Secara Paksa dan Pemberontakan Petani. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Sing, Rajendra, 2001, Social Movement, Old and New: A PostModernist Critique. New Delhi/Thousand Oaks/London: Sage Publications.

Smelser, Neil J., 1962, Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: The Free Press.

_____________, 1981, Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, New Best: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Strauss, A. Dan Corbin, J., 1998, Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Edisi ke-2. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Sunarto, Kamanto, 2000, Pengantar Sosiologi, Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FE UI.

Tilly, Charles, 1978, From Mobilization to Revolution. Amerika Serikat: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Turner, Jonathan Ralph H, 1991, The Structure of Sociological Theory: First Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

_____________________, 1998, The Structure of Sociological Theory. Sixth Edition. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Cable, Sherry dan Degutis, Beth, 1997, Movements Outcomes and Dimensions of Social Change: the Multiple Effects of Local Mobilizations. Current Sociology, Vol. 45 Nomor 3 Juli 1997, SAGE Publications, halaman 121–135.

crossref

Haber, Paul Lawrence, 1997, Social Movements and Socio-Political Change in Latin America. Current Sociology, Januari 1997, Vol. 45, SAGE Publicationsment, halaman 121–140. crossref

Jaeyeol, Yee, 2000, Network Analysis of Solidarity Ties among Social Movement Organizations. Korea Journal/Autumn, 2000, halaman 58–94.

Keun, Song Ho, 2000, Analysis of Participants in the New Social Movements in Korea: Mobilization and Network. Korea Journal/autumn, 2000, halaman 95–130.

Martin, Peter dan Halpin, Darren, 1998, Landcare as a Politically Relevan New Social Movement ?, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 14, Elsevier Science, halaman 445–457. crossref

Omvedt, Gail, 1994, Peasants, Dalits and Women: Democracy and India’s New Social Movement, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 24 No. 1, 1994, halaman 35–48. crossref

Rosenthal, Naomi; Fingrutd, Meryl; dan Ethier, Mchele, et.al., 1985, Social Movements and Network Analysis: A Case Study of Nineteent-Century Women’s Reform in New York State. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 90 Nomor 5 Maret 1985, halaman 1022–1054. crossref

Tilly, Charles, 1998, Social Movements and (all sors of) other Political Interactions-Local, National, and International-Including Identities, Theory and Society 27:453–480, 1998. crossref

Gould, Roger V., 2000, Why Do Networks Matter? Rationalist and Structuralist Interpretations, paper dalam Workshop tentang “Social Movement Analysis: The Network Perspective” di Loch Lomond Skotlandia tanggal 22–25 Juni 200, http://www.nd.edu/~dmyers/lomond/passy-pdf, (diunduh pada tanggal 27 Nopember 2001).

Molyneux, Maxine, 1998, Analysing Women’s Movements, Development and Change Vol. 29 (1998), 219–245. crossref




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v12i1.162

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by

Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya

Pusat Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan - Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (P2KK-LIPI)
Research Center for Society and Culture - Indonesian Institute of Sciences
Widya Graha Lantai VI & IX
Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto No.10 Jakarta Selatan
12710

  • ISSN 1410-4830 (print)
  • e-ISSN 2502-1966 (online)
  • Accreditation : No. 21/E/KPT/2018 (Kemenristekdikti)

    • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License