RELASI MASYARAKAT DAN PERUSAHAAN SARI BUMI KUSUMA (SBK) DALAM PENGELOLAAN HUTAN DI HULU SUNGAI KATINGAN, KALIMANTAN TENGAH

Authors

  • Mohammad Fathi Royyani Pusat Penelitian Biologi - LIPI
  • Abdul Sukur Universitas Islam Negeri Gunung Djati
  • Oscar Efendy Pusat Penelitian Biologi - LIPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i2.529

Keywords:

Hutan, Transformasi Masyarakat, Marjinal, Pemberdayaan, Swasta

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan relasi antara masyarakat dan perusahaan kehutanan yang memiliki izin konsesi di Kalimantan Tengah. Terdapat masyarakat yang sudah lama tinggal di dalam kawasan konsesi tersebut. Diantara bentuk relasi antara kedua pihak adalah adanya kesepakatan bahwa swasta memberikan pelayanan sosial kepada masyarakat, selain sebagai bentuk tanggung jawab sosial juga sebagai ruang baru bagi swasta untuk berelasi dengan masyarakat. Dengan menggunakan konsep-kritis tentang negara, artikel ini berusaha menjelaskan cara perusahaan berperan sebagai negara pada satu sisi sedangkan di sisi lain tetap berorientasi keuntungan. Melalui pembahasan mengenai program-program yang diberikan, artikel ini berargumen bahwa peran-peran swasta dalam memberdayakan dan membangun masyarakat adalah bagian dari sistem produksi. This paper aims to discuss the relation between local peoples and private sector who has forest concession in Central Kalimantan. There are local peoples living for years in the concession area. Onetype of interaction between those two parties is private sector should empower and develop local people. This commitment is a ‘new space’ for private sector to relate with local people. Using critical state theories, I will explain how private sector act like a state in one side and maintain the profit oriented side on the other side. Through discussion about empowering programs, I argue that private sector roles in empowering and developing local people are part of their production system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, Philip. (1988). “Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the Stateâ€. Journal of Historical Sociology Vol. 1 No. 1

Anderson, Benedict. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso. London

Barr, C. (2002). Desentralization of Forest administration in Indonesia: Implication for forest sustainability, community livelihood and economic development. Cifor, Bogor

Contreas-Hermosila, A& Fay, C. (2005). Strengthening forest management in Indonesia through land tenure reform: issues and framework for action. Forest Trends and World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Indonesia.

Corrigan, Philip. (1994). “State Formationâ€, in Joseph, Gilbert, M dan Daniel Nugent. (eds.). Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Mexico. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Dove, Michael R. (1988). Sistem Perladangan Di Indonesia: Studi kasus Di Kalimantan Barat, Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.

Eilenberg, Michael. (2012). At the Edges of States: Dynamics of state Formation in the Indonesian borderlands. KITLV Press. Leiden

Ellen, R. (2002). “Pengetahuan tentang hutan, transformasi hutan: Ketidakpastian politik, sejarah ekologi, dan renegosiasi terhadap alam di Seram Tengah†dalam Li, Tania Murray (peny). 2002. Proses Transformasi Daerah Pedalaman di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Ferguson, J dan Akhil Gupta. (2002). “Spatializing states: Toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality†American Ethnologist 29 (4): 981-1002. American Anthropological Association. crossref

Foucault, Michel, (1995). Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Vintage, New York.

Ghee, Lim Teck & Gomes, Alberto G (peny). (1993). Suku Asli dan Pembangunan di Asia Tenggara. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta.

Gupta, A. (1995). “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined Stateâ€. American Ethnologist 22 (2): 375-402. American Anthropological Association.

Hansen, Thomas Blom dan Stepputat, Finn (ed). (2001). State of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State. Duke University Press. Durham and London. crossref

Ilon, Nathan, Y. (1990). Ilustrasi dan Perwujudan Lambang Batang Garing dalam Dandang Tingang; Sebuah Konsepsi Memanusiakan Manusia dalam Filsafat Suku Dayak Ngaju, Kalimantan Tengah. TT. Proyek Bantuan Pembinaan Kebudayaan Daerah Tingkat I Kalimantan Tengah.

Ishikawa, Noburu. (2012). Between Frontier. Nation and Identity in a Southeast Asian Borderland. NUS Singapore dan NIAS Press.

Joseph, Gilbert, M dan Daniel Nugent. 1994. Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Mexico. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Joseph, Gilbert, M dan Daniel Nugent. (1994). Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Mexico. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Kelly, J, D., dan Martha Kaplan. (2003). Nation and Decolonization: Toward a new anthropology of nationalism. Anthropological Theory Vol 1(4): 419–437. SAGE Publications London, housand Oaks, CA and New Delhi

Li, Tania Murray (ed.). (2002). Proses Transformasi Daerah Pedalaman di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta

Li, Tania Murray. (2012). The Will to Improve: Perencanaan, Kekuasaan, dan Pembangunan di Indonesia. Marjin Kiri. Jakarta. Penerjemah Hery Santoso, Pujo Semedi dari judul asli The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press

Marin-Burgos, V., Acces, Power, and Justice in Commodity Frontiers; The Political Ecology of Access to Land and Palm Oil Expansion in Colombia; The Netherlands, University of Twente, Enschede.

Maring, Prudensius. (2010). Bagaimana Kekuasaan Bekerja di Balik Konflik, Perlawanan, dan Kolaborasi: Sebuah Sudut Pandang Antropologi Tentang Perebutan Sumber daya Ekologi. Lembaga Pengkajian Antropologi Kekuasaan Indonesia. Bekasi.

Marzali, Amri, (2002). Hukum Adat dan Komersialisasi Hutan di Luar Pulau Jawa Pada Masa Orde Baru. dalam Endang Suhendar (Penyunting). Menuju Keadilan Agraria: 70 Tahun Gunawan Wiradi. Akatiga. Bandung.

Migdal, Joel S. (2001). State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge University Press

Mitchell, Timothy. (1991). “The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and Their Criticsâ€. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 1. (Mar., 1991), pp.77-96. crossref

Parker, Lyn. (2003). From Subjects To Citizens: Baliness Vilagers in the Indonesian Nation State. Leifsgade: NIAS Press

Peluso, Nancy Lee. (1993). Coercing Conservation?: The Politics of State Resource Control. Publisher, Butterworth-Heinemann

Peluso, Nancy Lee. (1998). “Legal Pluralism and Legacies of ‘Customary Right’ in Indonesia and Malaysian Borneo.†Dalam Common Property Resources Digest 47:10-13

Peluso, Nancy Lee. (2006). Hutan Kaya, Rakyat Melarat: Penguasaan Sumber Daya dan Perlawanan Rakyat. Yogyakarta: Insist Press

Pembinaan Masyarakat Desa Hutan. (2009). Identifikasi Hak dan Kawasan Tradisional Masyarakat Desa Tanjung Paku di IUPHHK PT. Sari Bumi Kusuma Kalimantan Tengah. Report PMDH, The Nature Conservancy, Fauna Flora International

Roseberry, William. (1994). Hegemony and The Language of Contention, (in) Joseph, Gilbert, M dan Daniel Nugent (eds.). Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Mexico. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Sayer, Derek. (1994). Everyday Forms of State Formation: Some Dissudent Remarks on “Hegemony. Ini Joseph, Gilbert, M dan Daniel Nugent. (eds.). Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Mexico. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Scoot, James C. (1998). Seeing Like A State: How certain Schemes to Improve the Human Have Failed. Yale University Press. crossref

Soedjito, H. (1995). Masyarakat Dayak: Perladangan dan Pelestarian Plasma Nutfah. Prosiding Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Etnobotani II : 330 – 341. 24-25 Januari 1995. Puslitbang Biologi-LIPI, Fak. Biologi UGM, Ikatan Pustakawan Indonesia. Yogyakarta.

Tipa, Gail & Welch, Richard. (2006). “Comanagement of Natural Resources: Issues of Definition From an Indegenous Perspectiveâ€. The Journal of Applaied Behavioral Science, Vol. 42 No. 3 pp 373-391. crossref

Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. (2001). “The Anthropology of the State in the Age of Globalization: Close Encounters of the Deceptive Kindâ€. Current Anthropology Volume 42, Number 1. crossref

Wolf, Eric Robert. (1982). Europe and People Without History. Universitas of California Press

http://www.saribumikusuma.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46:sejarah&catid=35:sejarah&Itemid=53. Diakses hari rabu, 18 Januari 2017, pukul 11.45

http://www.saribumikusuma.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=60&Itemid=78 diakses haru Jum’at, 13 Oktober 2017, pukul 10:00.

Published

2018-01-21

Issue

Section

ARTICLES